河北环境工程学院学报

当前,碳汇权在法律规范中存在属性界定不清、司法救济路径缺失等问题。究其根源,既有学说多从单一视角进行定性,难以充分解释碳汇权公、私交织的复合属性。为此,德国双阶理论的引入恰逢其时,是界定碳汇权法律属性的正当性基础。在双阶理论视域下,碳汇权法律属性的界定,应分别从前阶公权赋权和后阶私权交易两方面展开。在碳汇权法律性质界定的基础上,碳汇权的司法救济也相应地从前、后阶展开,构建行政救济与民事救济分工协同、衔接有序的双阶救济路径。

The current regulatory framework for carbon sink rights reveals ambiguities in defining their legal attributes and the absence of judicial remedies. Tracing its roots, most existing theories adopt a single perspective for qualitative analysis, making it difficult to fully explain the complex interplay of public and private attributes in carbon sink rights. For this purpose, the introduction of the German two-stage theory is timely and serves as the legitimate foundation for defining the legal attributes of carbon sink rights. Under the two-stage theory, the delineation of carbon sink rights' legal attributes should proceed from two aspects: the first stage of public authority empowerment and the second stage of private rights transactions. Based on the definition of carbon sink rights' legal nature, judicial remedies for carbon sink rights should correspondingly unfold across the two tiers, establishing a two-stage remedial pathway that features division of labor and coordinated, orderly connection between administrative and civil remedies.